Mutual Aid

Would Increased Democracy Equal Increased Safety?

I attended an incident safety-officer course in my area and enjoyed the education and refresher on what the incident safety officer could bring to the scene. But soon I realized that much of the safety aspect relied on this one person, maybe two or three at a large incident. A few slides mentioned that everyone is accountable for their own safety, but nowhere did I see the concept of crew resource management or crew-member empowerment that the IAFC advocates. Crew resource management is a concept that originated in the airline industry, which aimed to reduce near-miss and catastrophic accidents.

Less than a week after I attended the course, I came across the article, “Incident Command as a Participative-Management Practice: Dispelling the Myth of Authoritarian Command.” In it, B.E. William described the incident command system as more of a democratic process than the traditional autocratic process we have described for many years. He noted that information flow and empowerment of the operating personnel were more important than the one-sided view of the incident commander.

The IAFC’s annual safety standdowns focus on taking personal responsibility for health, suggesting that each individual is responsible for his or her own safety. This personal responsibility is finally recognized as the culture we must promote to solve a large portion of the firefighter deaths each year.

One of the 16 life-safety initiatives is empowerment of personnel to stop unsafe acts. This implies that even the newest firefighters can question and stop an unsafe act. Many firefighter fatalities occur in the presence of other firefighters who witnessed unsafe acts that compounded to the point of a critical failure. I often wonder if more empowerment and a culture that accepts this empowerment would have prevented these events.

Lastly, the new generation of personnel entering the fire service, known as Millennials, has a trait that they are known for — the desire to question everything. I have attended a few conferences that have focused on the Millennials entering the work force, specifically, entering the paramilitary fire service. Overwhelmingly, speakers and fire service personnel discuss how much of a clash this mentality will create in the paramilitary organization of the fire service, where their opinion is not always correct or desired. Many are unsure with how this questioning mentality will work during fire suppression activities.

But is this questioning attitude — coupled with the increased realization of the benefits of empowerment for stopping unsafe acts —exactly what we need to reduce line-of-duty deaths? Or would encouraging a generation that already questions everything only result in command chaos? How do we properly empower individual firefighters while maintaining operational command? Are we at the turning point for firefighter empowerment, and how do we train our experienced personnel to adapt to this change?

Please login or register to post comments

What's Mutual Aid?

Mutual Aid is a blog of news and views from FIRE CHIEF staff and industry experts -- a virtual conversation about the issues important to you.

Contributors

Janet Wilmoth

Janet Wilmoth grew up in a family of firefighters in a Chicago suburb. She first worked for FIRE CHIEF magazine in 1986 as an associate editor and also served as FIRE CHIEF's international...

Mary Rose Roberts

Mary Rose Roberts is a senior editor at Penton Media, with a focus on wireless technology, public safety and fire leadership for FIRE CHIEF, Urgent Communications and Wildfire magazines. She also...
Blog Archive