Mutual Aid

In Firefighter Safety, Technology Can't Replace Personal Responsiblity

 

During meetings last week in Florida, I met with several manufacturers from different segments of the fire-service industry. Each conversation evolved around new technology in emergency response, be it for data collection or enhanced safety.

For instance, FirePrograms Software last year introduced a maintenance program that can record data from practically every part of a vehicle. The program also can record the starts, stops, acceleration and deceleration of a responding vehicle. If an apparatus exceeds a set speed, the program can alert an officer or the chief.

FireProgram President Gary Ewers and I discussed the pros and cons of so much information. The information is valuable from a diagnostic standpoint. It’s valuable from a training standpoint, as well, as the information recorded could also monitor an operator’s performance with the vehicle. Ewers also said such information can be extremely valuable in the event of a lawsuit and amid accusations of delayed response or arrival.

But is monitoring such information precautionary or Big Brother-esque?

In the private sector, courts have allowed corporations to monitor their employees’ computers. Why shouldn’t fire departments monitor the use of their vehicles and equipment to protect themselves from liability issues?

I later spoke with Grady North, a product manager at E-One, about the addition of video data recorders on apparatus required by NFPA 1901. The data recorder contains a seven-day history of the vehicle and its movements. The must be loaded on a USB drive and transferred to a computer to be viewed.

“How many departments really go in and review the data on that VDR,” North asked, suggesting that most do so only after an emergency. 

The conversations made me wonder about the increasing number of safety devices in cabs, many prompted by the deaths of unbuckled firefighters. Between seatbelts, airbags and alerting devices for the unbelted, it could be argued that Big Brother also is invading the cabs to protect firefighters from themselves.

How much more can NFPA standards — particularly 1901 — do to protect firefighters? Each time NFPA requires new equipment, the price of the vehicle goes up. Manufacturers claim the end users are demanding these devices; the end users claim the manufacturers are adding the equipment. Perhaps it’s time to make it less about equipment and more about personal responsibility and/or discipline. 

Discuss this Blog Entry 2

Steve Baumgartner (not verified)
on Sep 14, 2012

Amen. Perhaps if they know they are being monitored and it may cost them their jobs to be in violation, they will buckle up, slow down, and operate more safely. However, your point is right on target. Until we actually take personal responsibility, act maturely, and exercise discipline in operations, all we will have is a digital record of the accident after the fact. Good report.

Peter Stehman
on Sep 17, 2012

I also agree, Janet, that the fire service needs to be more accountable. The lack of personal responsibility is where so many of the fire service's problems begin. That being said, if technology is reasonably available which can save a life or prevent injury, why not use. Also, let's not forget that members of the fire service are well-represented on the NFPA Standards committees.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Mutual Aid?

Mutual Aid is a blog of news and views from FIRE CHIEF staff and industry experts -- a virtual conversation about the issues important to you.

Contributors

Janet Wilmoth

Janet Wilmoth grew up in a family of firefighters in a Chicago suburb. She first worked for FIRE CHIEF magazine in 1986 as an associate editor and also served as FIRE CHIEF's international...

Mary Rose Roberts

Mary Rose Roberts is a senior editor at Penton Media, with a focus on wireless technology, public safety and fire leadership for FIRE CHIEF, Urgent Communications and Wildfire magazines. She also...
Blog Archive